Hello. I'm Ryan Bigge, a Toronto-based content strategist and cultural journalist. I also dabble in creative technology. And just like Roman on Party Down, I have a prestigious blog.
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
Negotiating by the word
Last week I received an email from an editor of a glossy magazine based in the U.S. Not the A-list, but not the C-list either.
The editor wanted me to write a feature, about 1,800 words, a company profile. The fee was half of what I normally receive for magazine work. So I told the editor what my normal rate was, and that I would lose money writing the feature at the fee offered. (I do a lot of consulting and copywriting these days, so I’ve developed a nasty habit of calculating projects at an hourly rate.)
In my email, I asked the editor if there was room to negotiate. Instead of emailing me back with a counter-offer, the editor asked “What number would work for you?”
My answer was double the fee I was offered.
The editor then emailed back to say my fee was too steep and explained that the magazine is “a very small family-run indie magazine … that carries very little advertising.”
What’s curious to me is why the editor didn’t say that earlier in the process. Perhaps the editor was hoping my counter-offer would be within their budget. Perhaps the editor is bad at negotiating. But what if the editor had responded to my overtures to negotiate with the following:
“Hi Ryan. The most I can offer is $HighNumberThanFirstNumber. I’d like to offer more, but we’re a small indie magazine without a lot of advertising. Let me know if you can make that number work.”
I’m willing to bet that kind of transparency would have made me far more likely to say yes.
The editor wanted me to write a feature, about 1,800 words, a company profile. The fee was half of what I normally receive for magazine work. So I told the editor what my normal rate was, and that I would lose money writing the feature at the fee offered. (I do a lot of consulting and copywriting these days, so I’ve developed a nasty habit of calculating projects at an hourly rate.)
In my email, I asked the editor if there was room to negotiate. Instead of emailing me back with a counter-offer, the editor asked “What number would work for you?”
My answer was double the fee I was offered.
The editor then emailed back to say my fee was too steep and explained that the magazine is “a very small family-run indie magazine … that carries very little advertising.”
What’s curious to me is why the editor didn’t say that earlier in the process. Perhaps the editor was hoping my counter-offer would be within their budget. Perhaps the editor is bad at negotiating. But what if the editor had responded to my overtures to negotiate with the following:
“Hi Ryan. The most I can offer is $HighNumberThanFirstNumber. I’d like to offer more, but we’re a small indie magazine without a lot of advertising. Let me know if you can make that number work.”
I’m willing to bet that kind of transparency would have made me far more likely to say yes.
Saturday, October 18, 2014
Scare me once, shame on you
I voted out of fear in the recent Ontario
provincial election. I’m not proud of this decision, but it was clear that
Hudak was willing to destroy the public sector to win some kind of ideological
bet he made with Mike Harris. Since Toronto barely survived the last
Conservative government, I voted Liberal. The fact that Andrea Horwath ran a terrible and pandering campaign made
this decision a little easier, even though Jonah Schein is clearly a good dude
who deserved better.
I will not make the same mistake on October
27. It’s clear that no matter how many times I vote, Olivia Chow will not be
our next mayor. But I’m still going to vote for her. Doug Ford is a bully. We should have stood up to him four years ago, but for a variety of complicated
reasons, we were unable or unwilling.
I’m not afraid of big brother. Nor should
you. Fear of Doug Ford is not a good enough reason to vote for John Tory. Doug will
be lucky if he gets more than 25% of the vote.* I doubt he has the machinery required
to mobilize supporters and get them to the polls.
John Stuart Mill believed that humans try
to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. Voting for Tory is about minimizing
pain. Our shattered city will gain no pleasure from four years of Tory.
It’s a shame that an absence of pain is the
best Toronto can do.
--
*Fair warning: I pulled this number out of a
magical hat in the back of my closet. But I’m going to stick with it regardless
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
Leaked list of upcoming BlogTO brunch posts
Through some daring and complex espionage, I
secured a top secret list of BlogTO's upcoming brunch posts. Highlights include:
* The top 10 underwater brunch spots in
Toronto
* 5 Toronto brunch spots that even Shawn
Micallef could love
* Toronto top best 10 10 brunch best best
brunch brunch brunch Toronto 2015 1947 1867 2002
* The top 10 late evening brunch
restaurants in Toronto
* The top 10 brunch places in that area
south of the Junction but west of the Junction Triangle, I think the
neighbourhood is called Junc-Tri-High but I'm not entirely sure and at this
point I'm ruining our SEO which means I'm fired, aren't I, even though I don't
technically get paid for these articles in the first place, sigh
* The top 10 tattoo parlours that serve brunch in Toronto
* Best brunch lineup in Toronto
* 10 Instagram photos of screaming Toronto
infants in oversized strollers ruining brunch for everyone
* The best shitty brunch servers with
attitude in Toronto
* The top 10 Liechtenstein brunch spots in
Toronto
* Black History Month brunch in Toronto
2015
Monday, October 06, 2014
Karen McGrane visits the Toronto content strategy meetup in November
I’m super-mega-uber excited to announce
that Karen McGrane, author of Content
Strategy for Mobile, will be giving a guest talk at the Toronto Content
Strategy Meetup on November 4. She’ll reflect on what she’s learned since
writing her fantastic book and share her thoughts about the future of adaptive
content.
This event is a pretty big deal. Anyone who
cares about content strategy should attend. Please check out the Toronto
Content Strategy Meetup page for more information.
Saturday, October 04, 2014
The Doug Ford Dictionary
Ambrose Bierce had
the right idea. Please feel free to modify, build upon or otherwise run
with the idea I’ve started here...
Disingenuous: Any anti-Ford argument
supported by factual information.
Elite: An eloquent person who disagrees
with Doug Ford
Folks: Synonym for taxpayer.
Hell: The place where autistic children and
their parents deserve to live.
Ignorant: An ordinary person who disagrees
with Doug Ford.
Socialist: A person who believes
infrastructure costs money.
Taxpayer: A person who shares the same worldview as Doug Ford.
Taxpayer: A person who shares the same worldview as Doug Ford.
Sunday, September 14, 2014
Political narratives: Toronto edition
As anyone with a Twitter account is aware,
many things happened very quickly in Toronto on Friday September 12.
I was doing client work on Friday afternoon
and took a Twitter break every hour or so. And I kept waiting for a response to
Doug Ford running for mayor that was narrative-based. John Tory was quick to
point out that Doug is an angry man who is rude to those with autism (and
therefore is unfit for office). It took until Saturday for Olivia Chow to point
out that Doug and Rob are one and the same (minus the drug problems).
But because I have no love for Doug, what I really want is someone to spin a story that links together his actions over the past four years. A negative story that will stick to him over the next six weeks. Angry Doug and Doug-equals-Rob are both character-based attacks. Neither of them tell much of a story about Doug.
The federal Conservatives did a good job of
leveraging narrative with the “just visiting” ads aimed at Ignatieff. They told
a story about a man who left Canada and returned only because of political
ambitions. That narrative seemed to stick.
It might be a coincidence, but the “in over
his head” attacks on Justin Trudeau are character based. (This man doesn’t have
the experience and depth required to govern Canada). And they’re not working.
I’m sure there’s a subtle difference about
framing versus narrative to be had, but I’ll leave that to someone more versed
in politics than myself. I also have every confidence that there are plenty of
examples of successful character-based political attacks.
Narrative have been top of mind for me
lately, so this could just be a story hammer seeing everything as a story nail
problem. But I would love to listen to a brainstorming session where Doug
narratives are tossed around:
- Doug only cares about power, not
Torontonians
- Doug wanted to leave city politics for
good – until Rob forced him to run for mayor
- In four years, Doug’s only attempt at
city building involved a monorail. Now he wants the keys to the mayor’s office.
- As campaign manager, Doug couldn’t keep
track of his brother’s substance abuse. How is Doug going to keep track of
important issues at city hall?
- The only reason Doug was elected to
council was because he hung onto the coattails of his little brother.
Sunday, August 17, 2014
RyanBigge.com is the new BiggeWorld
Hey everyone. I totally screwed up and failed to renew biggeworld.com. So after 14 years, it is dead. Or, to be more accurate, it has been replaced:
I could point out that I didn't receive a renewal notice from Dotster, but this isn't the time to quibble. The old site was pretty terrible and this is the nudge I was waiting for. In the next few weeks I'm going to work on RyanBigge.com
Look for more SEO inspired blog posts in the next few weeks.
I could point out that I didn't receive a renewal notice from Dotster, but this isn't the time to quibble. The old site was pretty terrible and this is the nudge I was waiting for. In the next few weeks I'm going to work on RyanBigge.com
Look for more SEO inspired blog posts in the next few weeks.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
I'm on the radio as part of Grownups Read Things They Wrote as Kids
Do you
have a radio? Want to hear me embarrass myself? Then tomorrow is your lucky
day. On Wednesday August 13 at 9:30am eastern time listen to CBC radio. I’ll be
reading from my grade 5 diary as part of Grownups Read Things They Wrote
as Kids (GRTTWaK).
Here’s
a teaser:
April 18
Today I got seven wrong on a
decimals exercise sheet. I got some speeches from mom.
There’s also a podcast version of GRTTWaK. Not sure when the animated series is set to
debut.
Saturday, August 09, 2014
Speculation Fiction
Last weekend I read the Dept. of Speculation by Jenny Offill in three or four sittings. A good book. A difficult book. Those two qualities aren't mutually exclusive:
For years, I kept a Post-it note above my desk. WORK NOT LOVE! was what it said. It seemed a sturdier kind of happiness.
***
We had told people. We had to untell them.
***
If he notices something is broken, he will try to fix it. He won't just think about how unbearable it is that things keep breaking, that you can never fucking outrun entropy.
***
He is ten years younger than we are, alert to any sign of compromise or dead-ending within us. "You are not allowed to compare your imagined accomplishments to our actual ones," someone says after the boy who is pure of heart leaves.
***
Some women make it look so easy, the way they cast ambition off like an expensive coat that no longer fits.
***
But my agent has a theory. She says every marriage is jerry-rigged. Even the ones that look reasonable from the outside are held together inside with chewing gum and wire and string.
***
There is nowhere to cry in this city.
***
These are the sorts of things they talk about in the Little Theatre of Hurt Feelings.
***
People keep flirting with the wife. Has this been happening all along and she never noticed? Or is it new? She's like a taxi whose light just went on. All these men standing in the street, waving her over.
***
She would not have let one of her students write the scene this way. Not with the pouring rain and the wife's broken umbrella and the girl in her long black coat.
***
Even if the husband leaves her in this awful craven way, she will still have to count it as a miracle, all of those happy years she spent with him.
***
The wife has a little room now, one that looks out over the garden. She makes a note to herself about the book she is writing. Too many crying scenes.
For years, I kept a Post-it note above my desk. WORK NOT LOVE! was what it said. It seemed a sturdier kind of happiness.
***
We had told people. We had to untell them.
***
If he notices something is broken, he will try to fix it. He won't just think about how unbearable it is that things keep breaking, that you can never fucking outrun entropy.
***
He is ten years younger than we are, alert to any sign of compromise or dead-ending within us. "You are not allowed to compare your imagined accomplishments to our actual ones," someone says after the boy who is pure of heart leaves.
***
Some women make it look so easy, the way they cast ambition off like an expensive coat that no longer fits.
***
But my agent has a theory. She says every marriage is jerry-rigged. Even the ones that look reasonable from the outside are held together inside with chewing gum and wire and string.
***
There is nowhere to cry in this city.
***
These are the sorts of things they talk about in the Little Theatre of Hurt Feelings.
***
People keep flirting with the wife. Has this been happening all along and she never noticed? Or is it new? She's like a taxi whose light just went on. All these men standing in the street, waving her over.
***
She would not have let one of her students write the scene this way. Not with the pouring rain and the wife's broken umbrella and the girl in her long black coat.
***
Even if the husband leaves her in this awful craven way, she will still have to count it as a miracle, all of those happy years she spent with him.
***
The wife has a little room now, one that looks out over the garden. She makes a note to herself about the book she is writing. Too many crying scenes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)